Commit 228dec2f by Felix Hilsky

### fix typo

parent 1abeda49
 ... @@ -167,8 +167,9 @@ From boundedness we get a weakly convergent subsequence \$`n^{(k_l)} ⇀ n`\$, whi ... @@ -167,8 +167,9 @@ From boundedness we get a weakly convergent subsequence \$`n^{(k_l)} ⇀ n`\$, whi --- --- *Lemma 2*: non-orientability is a stable property with respect to the \$`W^{1,p)(Ω, ℝ^9)`\$ norm: *Lemma 2*: non-orientability is a stable property with respect to the \$`W^{1,p}(Ω, ℝ^9)`\$ norm: Let \$`Q ∈ W^{1,p}(Ω, 𝒬), 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞`\$ be non-orientable. Then there exists \$`ε > 0`\$, depending on \$`Q`\$, so that for all \$`Q̃ ∈ W^{1,p}(Ω, 𝒬) with `\$\lVert Q̃−Q \rVert_{W^{1,p}(M,ℝ^9)} < ε\$ the line field Q̃ is also non-orientable. Let \$`Q ∈ W^{1,p}(Ω, 𝒬), 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞`\$ be non-orientable. Then there exists \$`ε > 0`\$, depending on \$`Q`\$, so that for all \$`Q̃ ∈ W^{1,p}(Ω, 𝒬) with `\$\lVert Q̃−Q \rVert_{W^{1,p}(M,ℝ^9)} < ε\$ the line field Q̃ is also non-orientable. *Proof of Lemma 2*: obvious, given Proposition 4 *Proof of Lemma 2*: obvious, given Proposition 4 ## Energy functionals ## Energy functionals ... ...
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment