make list a list

notes/paper-notes/q4-Orientiation-Equivalence.md

@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ Let $`Q ∈ W^{1,p}(Ω, 𝒬), 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞`$ be non-orientable. Then there e
 *Proof of Lemma 2*: obvious, given Proposition 4
 
 ## Energy functionals
+
 - specific energy functionals are regarded (p. 11/503) because they were looked at before and Oseen-Frank was successful for them
   - conversion between energy functionals possible